<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 從各大廠的行銷政策談 Open Source Software / Free Software 的推廣 (TOC Only)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knightfeng.org/blog/archives/41/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnightFeng.org/blog/archives/41</link>
	<description>What happened with knight during days</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: knight</title>
		<link>http://KnightFeng.org/blog/archives/41#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 01:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnightFeng.org/archives/41#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Got your point. :)

IMHO, I just want to write a post (of course not paper, maybe later) of Micro$oft-style software (or those big commercial software) v.s. the other side (that is, OSS/FS/.... whatever), the problem will not be focused on the difference between OSS/FS/..., but will be focused on commercial-based and community-based. Of course those company who use OSS/FS in their commercial plan will be also discussed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got your point. :)</p>
<p>IMHO, I just want to write a post (of course not paper, maybe later) of Micro$oft-style software (or those big commercial software) v.s. the other side (that is, OSS/FS/&#8230;. whatever), the problem will not be focused on the difference between OSS/FS/&#8230;, but will be focused on commercial-based and community-based. Of course those company who use OSS/FS in their commercial plan will be also discussed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
